In praise of INEC Naij.com Poltical Analyst Adedayo Ademuwagun writes; 9 ways Jega and his team improved elections in Nigeria.

Attahiru Jega and his team came on board in June 2010 at a time when election management was extremely messed up. His predecessor Maurice Iwu had organised one of the worst elections in Nigerian history in 2007. The elections held that year were simply appalling.
Voter turnout was dismal. Rigging was blatant. Logistics were awful, and going to a polling booth was like going to a riot scene. People had given up on elections. Put this way, Jega inherited a crappy INEC.
The new INEC board brought in some fresh ideas and tried to fix the system before the 2011 elections, and they performed remarkably. The elections they’ve since organised are generally believed to be the best since the return to democracy in 1999.
INEC still needs fixing because they’re obviously struggling right now to prepare for the coming elections. However, the current leadership deserves some credit for the improvement they’ve brought into the system. Elections have clearly improved in the last five years. These are 10 things the board did to make this happen.
The commission rolled out its personnel and direct data capture machines between January and February 2011, and over 73.5 million voters registered. Now the commission has a proper biometric record to work with.
The first phase would be for voters accreditation and must be completed before the actual voting phase starts later in the day. This innovative system made multiple voting difficult since only accredited voters could cast the ballot and no accredited voter could do it twice. It worked during the 2011 elections and has been in use since then.
The manual procedure was that all results must be displayed at the polling units and collation centres once votes have been counted and results declared. Then the papers would be transferred to the state office for safe- keeping not later than 48 hours after each poll.
The electronic procedure was that, at least for the presidential election, collation at the state and federal level were subjected to accuracy checks by using an excel spread sheet application to eliminate computation errors. So all results were projected on a screen and publicly displayed as they were announced.
E-copies of the results were also transmitted electronically from the state collation centres to the presidential returning officer using a secure email address in order to prevent tampering with the manual copies while in transit.
It will be recalled that as elections approach, Political analyst Adedayo Ademuwagun writes what you need to know about why politicians are slinging mud at each other.
Attahiru Jega and his team came on board in June 2010 at a time when election management was extremely messed up. His predecessor Maurice Iwu had organised one of the worst elections in Nigerian history in 2007. The elections held that year were simply appalling.
Voter turnout was dismal. Rigging was blatant. Logistics were awful, and going to a polling booth was like going to a riot scene. People had given up on elections. Put this way, Jega inherited a crappy INEC.
The new INEC board brought in some fresh ideas and tried to fix the system before the 2011 elections, and they performed remarkably. The elections they’ve since organised are generally believed to be the best since the return to democracy in 1999.
INEC still needs fixing because they’re obviously struggling right now to prepare for the coming elections. However, the current leadership deserves some credit for the improvement they’ve brought into the system. Elections have clearly improved in the last five years. These are 10 things the board did to make this happen.
- Setting up a new biometric voter register
The commission rolled out its personnel and direct data capture machines between January and February 2011, and over 73.5 million voters registered. Now the commission has a proper biometric record to work with.
- Using NYSC members for the job
- Introducing the Remodified Open Secret Ballot System (REMOBS)
The first phase would be for voters accreditation and must be completed before the actual voting phase starts later in the day. This innovative system made multiple voting difficult since only accredited voters could cast the ballot and no accredited voter could do it twice. It worked during the 2011 elections and has been in use since then.
- Using university staff for collation and returning
- Introducing Registration Area Centres (RACs)
- Use of social media
- Working with a hybrid collation strategy
The manual procedure was that all results must be displayed at the polling units and collation centres once votes have been counted and results declared. Then the papers would be transferred to the state office for safe- keeping not later than 48 hours after each poll.
The electronic procedure was that, at least for the presidential election, collation at the state and federal level were subjected to accuracy checks by using an excel spread sheet application to eliminate computation errors. So all results were projected on a screen and publicly displayed as they were announced.
E-copies of the results were also transmitted electronically from the state collation centres to the presidential returning officer using a secure email address in order to prevent tampering with the manual copies while in transit.
- The verification of polling Units
- Restriction of movement
It will be recalled that as elections approach, Political analyst Adedayo Ademuwagun writes what you need to know about why politicians are slinging mud at each other.
No comments:
Post a Comment